|
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
Debts, Late Payment An interest rate of 8% above the Bank of England base rate is fairly impressive. The Late Payment of Commercial Debts (Interest) Act 1998 allows such interest to be claimed from a date 30 days after the date on which the supplier has performed its obligation. Accordingly, it has a contractual entitlement to statutory interest. Since November 1998, the Act has applied to small businesses (ie. up to 50 employees), claiming against large businesses (ie. over 50 employees), and the public sector. However, since 1 November 2000 the Act has been extended so that small businesses can now claim the statutory interest against other small businesses. It is worth making the point that the Act only applies to contracts for the supply of goods or services where both sides are acting in the course of a business (ie. it is not for consumer contracts). The likelihood is that the Act will be extended to all businesses whether large or small in 2002. For further information please contact James Knight of Shakespeares.
Property Law Update The Lease/Licence distinction The lease/licence distinction continues to exercise the minds of the Courts. In the case of National Car Parks Limited v Trinity Developments Co. (Banbury) Limited [2000] a document described as a "licence" authorised NCP to manage a shoppers' car park. The owner was paid a percentage of the net profits. The agreement was from year to year until determined by either party on 3 months' notice. The owner served such a notice and NCP claimed to have a lease under Part II of the Landlord & Tenant Act 1954. The agreement was held to be a licence because NCP did not have exclusive possession of the land. When granting a licence it is imperative that the owner retains a degree of physical control to avoid granting exclusive possession to the occupier. For further
information please contact Linda Phillips Estoppel arises where someone [A] is encouraged by another [B] to act to A's detriment in circumstances where it would be unconscionable for B to assert his legal rights. To be successful A needs to show that B not only encouraged a particular belief but also a further belief that B would not change his mind. This doctrine was examined fully by the Court of Appeal in the case of Gillett v Holt [2000]. The case revolved around various remarks made by Mr. Holt over a period of 43 years which encouraged Mr. Gillett to believe that he would take over the running of Mr. Holt's farm and inherit his farming business. The parties fell out and Mr. Gillett was excluded from Mr. Holt's Will. The Court awarded Mr. Gillett the farmhouse together with certain farm land and £100,000 compensation for exclusion from the farming business. For further information please contact Linda Phillips Landlord and Tenant Compensation The Court of Appeal in Sun Life Assurance Plc -v-Thales Tracs Limited recently considered whether a tenant, requesting a new tenancy under Section 26 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, needed to have a genuine intention to take up a new tenancy at the time of making the request, in order to qualify for statutory compensation. The Court decided a genuine intention was not required as Section 26 was a statutory formality - landlords beware! For further information please contact Lisa Robotham Break Clauses in Leases A break clause in a lease, terminating a lease before the contractual expiry date, will usually provide for precise requirements, particularly as to dates, to be contained within the break notice. The law before 1997 was clear, the express requirements of the relevant clause had to be complied with, any errors would invalidate the notice and it was irrelevant that the recipient understood what was intended. The case of Mannai Investment Co. Ltd -v- Eagle Star Life Assurance Co. Ltd in 1997 represented a turning point when it was held that any immaterial errors that would not have misled a reasonable recipient could be ignored. Later case law established that this approach applied equally to statutory notices and to other contractual notices. Subsequent case law has somewhat blurred the circumstances when Mannai can be relied upon. The cases of Lemmerbell Ltd -v- Britannia 1998 and Havant International Holdings Ltd -v- Lionsgatge 1999 highlight this point. The Court will not allow evidence to be adduced as to the recipient's actual knowledge that an error is obvious and immaterial to the recipient; the test is objective. Recent cases have considered the actual service of the notice and the question of the place at which a notice must be served. The case of Claire's Accessories UK Ltd -v- Kensington High Street Associates LLC examined this point. The lease included a landlord only break clause. Although the clause contained no specific requirements for service of the notice, a general provision in the lease stated any notices served had to comply with Section 196 of the Law of Property Act 1925 provided that where the tenant was a company, notices had to be served on it at its registered office. The landlord had served the notice however at the tenants demised premises. Under Section 196 this would have been sufficient service but the Court felt the key question was whether the proviso for service on the tenant at its registered office was mandatory or merely permissive. A permissive construction might be found where the alternative method of service may be no less disadvantageous. Here, there was probably good reason why service at the registered office was required and the Court found the proviso was therefore mandatory. Although Mannai may assist where there are errors in the notice itself, it is clear that requirements governing the actual service of notices must be strictly complied with. For further
information please contact Ranjit Bassey Payment by Cheques An interesting case (Commercial Union Life Assurance Co. Ltd and Label Ink Ltd) has arisen where the Courts held that rent was "paid" at the point where the tenant put his cheque in the post rather than when it was received, pursuant to the Bills of Exchange Act 1982. Therefore, although rent was due on 1st January the tenant was not in default for "non-payment" of rent for the purpose of exercising a break clause on 1st January, even though his rent cheque did not arrive until 4th January. This was because he had posted it on 30th December. The invoice in this case had specifically requested the tenant to pay by cheque through the post. Unfortunately for the tenant, he still lost because the Court considered late payment to be a "material breach", the second condition attached to exercising the break clause. This could however have all sorts of ramifications with possible claims for premature forfeiture or unlawful distress, where the landlord re-enters or sends in certified bailiffs the day after rent falls due, unaware that "the cheque is in the post". For further information please contact Julie Russell Business Services Bulletin is produced on a bi-monthly basis to provide you with up to date information on some of the latest changes that may affect your business. Please do not hesitate to contact Shakespeares if you require any further information. Telephone : 0121 632 4199 Fax : 0121 643 2257 E-Mail : lisa.robotham@shakespeares.co.uk This
Business Services Bulletin is not intended to be a definitive analysis
of legislative or other changes and professional advice should be taken
before a course of action is pursued. Internet Legalities - The Data Protection Act The 1998 Data Protection Act came into force early in 1999 and covers how information about living and identifiable persons is used. It is much broader in scope than the earlier 1984 act, which was limited to information held on computers. The Data Protection Act, of course, is mandatory. ALL organisations that hold or process personal data MUST comply and to do so they must register their uses of the personal data that they hold. The Data Protection Act states that any personal information that is held should comply with the following eight principles of good practice. * fairly and
lawfully processed;*
processed for limited purposes; *
adequate, relevant and not excessive; *
accurate;* not kept
longer than necessary; * processed in accordance with the data subject's
rights; * secure;* not transferred to countries without adequate protection.
Personal data covers both facts and opinion about the individual. It also includes information regarding the intentions of the data controller towards the individual, such as whether the information will be used for marketing purposes. The types of
information that the data protection act covers include such things as
contact databases, whether you are storing emails received from clients,
personnel files and client files where they contain say, a contact name.
|
|||||